The Fed Raised Rates Because of Hormuz. Now That Oil Is at $87, It May Not Raise Them Again.

Fed Chairman Warsh’s statement that the Fed will ‘monitor closely’ before deciding on a second rate hike is standard central bank communication for: we may not hike next time. The specific condition Warsh is monitoring: whether the deal’s oil price relief is durable. The deal produced $87 oil from $100+. If $87 holds through the 90-day extension, the inflationary pressure from Hormuz that drove the Wednesday hike is reduced. If $87 does not hold — if Bab el-Mandeb remains closed or the parallel Houthi track fails — the inflation pressure may return.

Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh delivers remarks at his swearing-in ceremony in the East Room of the White House, Friday, May 22, 2026. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

THE ECONOMIC FEEDBACK LOOP  

The specific feedback loop the deal created:

▸  Iran deal announced September 18

▸  Oil fell $13 from $100+ to $87

▸  Reduced oil prices reduce energy inflation

▸  Reduced energy inflation reduces pressure on the Fed to hike

▸  Fed signals it may pause the second hike

▸  Pause means borrowing costs don’t increase further for US consumers

▸  The family whose variable-rate mortgage was discussed in September 13’s Section A is directly affected

THE ECB PARALLEL  

The ECB — which raised rates on September 13 citing the Iran war — is also monitoring the deal’s energy price effect. If oil stays near $87, European energy inflation reduces, and the ECB may not need to raise rates further. The deal’s economic value is not just in the oil price; it is in the central bank rate decisions that the oil price reduction makes unnecessary.

THE BRENT-WTI SPREAD  

Brent crude and WTI crude both fell on the deal announcement. Brent — the global benchmark — is particularly affected by Hormuz access because it prices in the risk premium of Gulf supply disruption. A durable Hormuz commercial transit guarantee reduces the Brent premium that the two-chokepoint crisis had built into global oil pricing. Whether the $87 level is sustainable depends on the deal holding, the parallel Houthi track making progress, and the East-West pipeline being restored.

The Fed raised rates because of Hormuz. The deal dropped oil to $87. Now Warsh says he’ll monitor before the second hike. The economic transmission from the deal to American consumer borrowing costs is: lower oil, lower inflation, the Fed doesn’t have to raise rates again. Every American with a variable-rate debt instrument is a beneficiary of the deal holding. If the Houthi track fails and oil goes back above $100, those same consumers pay more again.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT  

▸  Next Fed meeting — whether the monitoring produces a pause decision

▸  Oil price trajectory — whether $87 is durable or the Bab el-Mandeb situation pushes it back up

▸  ECB next meeting — parallel monitoring on European energy inflation

▸  Brent premium — whether the two-chokepoint risk premium fully deflates under the deal

CONFIDENCE:
HIGH
Warsh Fed monitor closely before second hike, oil $87 deal announcement, ECB parallel monitoring from confirmed reporting.

SOURCES

▸  Confirmed reporting — Fed Warsh monitor second hike oil September 19 2026

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top